Watch for
Planning based on best-case scenarios rather than past performance.
We underestimate how long things will take.
The tendency to underestimate task completion times and costs, even when past experience shows similar tasks took longer.
Planning based on best-case scenarios rather than past performance.
Use base rates: how long did similar tasks actually take?
Assuming a project will take two weeks when a similar one took four, because "this time will be different."
Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky
First described in 1979
The "Inside View." When mapping out a project, individuals plan based on an idealized, step-by-step narrative of how the future will unfold under perfect conditions. They fail to look outward ("the Outside View") to consult historical distributional data regarding how long that exact type of task usually takes for other people.
Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (1979), "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk," published in Econometrica.
Below is a realistic scenario. Read it, then choose what you would do. The feedback will show whether a cognitive bias influenced your choice — not to judge, but to reveal the pattern in action.
This experiment places you in a realistic decision. Your instinctive choice will reveal whether bias is at work.
The planning fallacy comes from focusing on the unique characteristics of the current project (inside view) while ignoring the statistical distribution of similar past projects (outside view). The cure is simple but counterintuitive: ignore the specifics and ask "how long did similar things actually take?" The outside view is almost always more accurate.