Watch for
Selective reading habits, rapid dismissal of disagreement, and feeling "obviously right" before checking evidence.
Favouring information that supports what we already believe.
The tendency to search for, interpret, favour, and recall information in a way that confirms existing beliefs or hypotheses, while giving disproportionately less attention to information that challenges them.
Selective reading habits, rapid dismissal of disagreement, and feeling "obviously right" before checking evidence.
Ask what evidence would change your mind, then deliberately read the strongest opposing case.
Someone reads only news sources that reinforce their political views and scrolls past contradictory headlines without clicking.
Peter Wason
First described in 1960
Cognitive Economy and Schema Preservation. Rewriting our foundational worldview requires a massive expenditure of neural energy and induces uncomfortable cognitive dissonance. It is metabolically cheaper to filter reality to fit the pre-existing map.
Peter C. Wason (1960), "On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task" (The famous 2-4-6 number pattern experiment).
Below is a realistic scenario. Read it, then choose what you would do. The feedback will show whether a cognitive bias influenced your choice — not to judge, but to reveal the pattern in action.
This experiment places you in a realistic decision. Your instinctive choice will reveal whether bias is at work.
Confirmation bias is about the brain's efficiency drive. We have limited attention, so we prioritise information that feels consistent. The cost is that disconfirming evidence gets filtered out before evaluation. Before reading any report, write down one thing that could prove your current belief wrong, then go look for it.