Watch for
Explaining something and being surprised the other person does not "get it."
Once you know something, it is hard to imagine not knowing it.
A cognitive bias where experts or informed individuals struggle to communicate with those who lack their background knowledge, because they cannot easily take the perspective of a novice.
Explaining something and being surprised the other person does not "get it."
Test your explanation on someone with no background before assuming it is clear.
A professor gives a lecture full of jargon that is incomprehensible to first-year students.
Colin Camerer, George Loewenstein, Martin Weber
First described in 1989
Inability to Mentally Simulate Ignorance. Once a piece of information is deeply integrated into your cognitive architecture, it becomes an automatic baseline. The brain cannot accurately delete its own data to view a problem from the perspective of a clean slate.
Colin Camerer, George Loewenstein, and Martin Weber (1989) in the Journal of Political Economy. Famously demonstrated by Elizabeth Newton's (1990) PhD dissertation where "tappers" guessed that "listeners" would easily identify famous songs tapped on a table 50% of the time, when the actual success rate was only 2.5%.
Below is a realistic scenario. Read it, then choose what you would do. The feedback will show whether a cognitive bias influenced your choice — not to judge, but to reveal the pattern in action.
This experiment places you in a realistic decision. Your instinctive choice will reveal whether bias is at work.
The curse of knowledge is not arrogance — it is a cognitive limitation. Once information is in your head, your brain cannot fully reconstruct the state of not having it. The remedy is testing, not simplifying. Explain, then ask your listener to rephrase. If they cannot, your explanation failed — not their attention.